Post-conflict recovery: institutions, aid, or Luck? by Antonio C. David, Fabiano R. Bastos and Marshall Mills, published by IMF. “This paper identifies the factors linked to cross-country differentials in growth performance in the aftermath of social conflict for 30 sub-Saharan African countries using panel data techniques. Our results show that changes in the terms of trade are the most important correlate of economic performance in post-conflict environments. The results suggest that exogenous factors (“luck”) are an importante factor in post-conflict recovery.”
Post-conflict recovery (David, Bastos and Mills)
Primeiro
a Compartilhar
Primeiro
a Compartilhar
ÚLTIMAS
- Calamidades climáticas: aprender custa menos do que reconstruir (Quesado, Afonso, Damasceno)
- The Perils of Narrowing Fiscal Spaces (Kase et al.)
- Public finance in the age of AI: A primer (Korinek & Lockwood)
- A Geoeconomia e a estrutura produtiva brasileira (Baumann)
- Could a BRICS Currency Work? (O’Neill)
MAIS VISTOS
-
Fórum de Economia (FGV/EESP)
setembro 26, 2013 -
Ampliação da Arrecadação (Da Silva & Calegari)
março 11, 2018 -
Introducción a la economía (Castro & Lessa)
junho 5, 2020
TAGS
BID
BNDES
Canuto
CEPAL
CIAT
coronavirus
COVID-19
Destaque
Estadão
Fabio Giambiagi
Felipe Salto
FGV
François E. J. de Bremaeker
FUNDAP
Geraldo Biasoto Jr.
Globo
IDP
IEDI
IMF
IPEA
José R. Afonso
José Roberto Afonso
José Serra
Juan Pablo Jiménez
Kleber P. Castro
LRF
Mansueto Almeida
Marcos Mendes
Ministério da Fazenda
OECD
Teresa Ter-Minassian
Valor Econômico
Vito Tanzi
World Bank
Élida Graziane Pinto
