Making banks safer: Can Volcker and Vickers do it? by Julian T. S. Chow and Jay Surti published by IMF. “This paper assesses proposals to redefine the scope of activities of systemically important financial institutions. It is argued that while the more radical of these proposals such as narrow utility banking do not adequately address key policy objectives, two concrete policy measures – the Volcker Rule in the United States and retail ring-fencing in the United Kingdom – are more promising while still entailing significant implementation challenges.”
Making Banks Safer (Chow and Surti)
Primeiro
a Compartilhar
Tags:
Chow and Surti
Primeiro
a Compartilhar
ÚLTIMAS
- Jovens, desconfiança e poupança para o futuro (Silva)
- The role of spending rigidity in fiscal adjustment (Mello & Jalles)
- Finance ministries must think about digital public infrastructure as they do roads and power grids (Coyle at al.)
- The Macroeconomic Consequences of Undermining Central Bank Independence (Bolhuis et al.)
- AI Meets Fiscal Policy (Das at al.)
MAIS VISTOS
-
Fórum de Economia (FGV/EESP)
setembro 26, 2013 -
Ampliação da Arrecadação (Da Silva & Calegari)
março 11, 2018 -
Introducción a la economía (Castro & Lessa)
junho 5, 2020
TAGS
BID
BNDES
Canuto
CEPAL
CIAT
coronavirus
COVID-19
Destaque
Estadão
Fabio Giambiagi
Felipe Salto
FGV
François E. J. de Bremaeker
FUNDAP
Geraldo Biasoto Jr.
Globo
IDP
IEDI
IMF
IPEA
José R. Afonso
José Roberto Afonso
José Serra
Juan Pablo Jiménez
Kleber P. Castro
LRF
Mansueto Almeida
Marcos Mendes
Ministério da Fazenda
OECD
Teresa Ter-Minassian
Valor Econômico
Vito Tanzi
World Bank
Élida Graziane Pinto
