Corporate political spending: why the new critics are wrong by Robert J. Shapiro and Douglas Dowson published by Manhattan Institute (06/2012). “Since the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision held that corporate political expenditures are free speech under the First Amendment, various groups and individuals have advocated imposing new limits on corporate political activity. These efforts include calls on shareholds to demand that corporations refrain from involvement in the political process. Such demands have been buttressed by an emergent academic literature which, in contrast to what had been an established perspective, has questioned whether corporate financial contributions and even lobbying are actually in the interest of corporate shareholders.”
Corporate Political Spending (Shapiro and Dowson)
Primeiro
a Compartilhar
Tags:
Shapiro and Dowson
Primeiro
a Compartilhar
ÚLTIMAS
- Jovens, desconfiança e poupança para o futuro (Silva)
- The role of spending rigidity in fiscal adjustment (Mello & Jalles)
- Finance ministries must think about digital public infrastructure as they do roads and power grids (Coyle at al.)
- The Macroeconomic Consequences of Undermining Central Bank Independence (Bolhuis et al.)
- AI Meets Fiscal Policy (Das at al.)
MAIS VISTOS
-
Fórum de Economia (FGV/EESP)
setembro 26, 2013 -
Ampliação da Arrecadação (Da Silva & Calegari)
março 11, 2018 -
Introducción a la economía (Castro & Lessa)
junho 5, 2020
TAGS
BID
BNDES
Canuto
CEPAL
CIAT
coronavirus
COVID-19
Destaque
Estadão
Fabio Giambiagi
Felipe Salto
FGV
François E. J. de Bremaeker
FUNDAP
Geraldo Biasoto Jr.
Globo
IDP
IEDI
IMF
IPEA
José R. Afonso
José Roberto Afonso
José Serra
Juan Pablo Jiménez
Kleber P. Castro
LRF
Mansueto Almeida
Marcos Mendes
Ministério da Fazenda
OECD
Teresa Ter-Minassian
Valor Econômico
Vito Tanzi
World Bank
Élida Graziane Pinto
